"Melissa reviews the recent Green Day trilogy of albums."

REVIEW: GREEN DAY – ¡UNO! ¡DOS! ¡TRE!


“A Trilogy of Mediocrity”

 

Green Day – ¡Uno! ¡Dos! ¡Tre!

by Melissa Mueller

 

Before I hit that wonderful adolescent age where all I wanted to listen to was punk, god awful nu-metal, and the industrial gothic bands made popular in the late 90’s, I was just a regular 11-year-old kid jamming to Dookie. Green Day had already hit the mainstream by then of course, thanks to the heavy rotation of “Longview” and “Basket Case” on MTV, making punk rock accessible to impressionable kids such as myself. Throughout their twenty five years, Green Day has managed to consistently recycle their sound to appeal to new generations as the previous ones grew up and moved on.

Despite Green Day’s punk influences, I never considered them much of an actual punk band – the closest they have come to a raw, unhinged sound was in their debut, 39/Smooth. The band’s latest efforts, a trilogy of records called Uno, Dos, and Tre respectively, is an interesting, albeit unwarranted, concept given the declining sale of records, the lack of diversity in Green Day’s music, and the short attention spans of youth in general. Then again, who would have thought a Broadway musical based on American Idiot would turn out to be a successful venture? Clearly, Green Day are entrepreneurs, so who am I to question their business decisions – especially when they claimed they are going “epic as fuck”? Unfortunately, Uno, Dos, and Tre are anything but grand.

 

¡Uno! ¡Dos! ¡Tre!

 

The first installment, Uno, was released in September, and contains the same basic format you would expect of a Green Day album: power pop hooks and infectious, repetitive choruses. Half the time Billie Joel Armstrong sounds as if he is just phoning in his vocals – “someone kill the DJ/shoot the fucking DJ,” he sings indifferently in the predictably titled song “Kill The DJ.”  The problem with Uno is the punk rock is lacking – the sound is too clean and overtly polished. The result is a bland, 41 minute snoozefest in which tracks cannot be distinguished from one another. Songs like “Angel Blue” are too pop-oriented with short, 4-line verses, and is best suited for background noise. I would be hard pressed to select anything that actually stands out here, but if I had to decide, I lean towards “Let Yourself Go”, a song that could easily substitute as a bonus track from Jimmy Eat World’s Bleed American.

[soundcloud]https://soundcloud.com/greenday/let-yourself-go[/soundcloud]

 

Luckily, Dos picks up the pace considerably. Released in November, the follow-up opens with a quick, one minute ballad, “See You Tonight” before it bleeds right into “Fuck Time,” which is probably the closest to their old-school punk rock roots Green Day has sounded in years. Because of this, Dos is a much more interesting record than its predecessor, both lyrically and production-wise. The “garage-rock” atmosphere that the band wanted to convey on the album is apparent throughout, evidenced by party-like anthems such as “Makeout Party” and their signature catchy hooks in “Lady Cobra.”

[soundcloud]https://soundcloud.com/sergiu-prodan-1/green-day-fuck-time[/soundcloud]

 

Green Day completed the series when they released Tre in December. Armstrong has described Tre as a mixed bag, and he’s right. While not terribly tedious like Uno, it lacks the energy of Dos. Whether it’s the predictable three chord riffs the band loves oh so much, displayed in songs like “Amanda” or mellow, forgettable tracks like “Brutal Love” Tre is both listless and bizarre simultaneously. It is not all bad though – “99 Revolutions” begins with simple drums and ends with a little more ferocity.

[soundcloud]https://soundcloud.com/green-day-leaks/99-revolutions-live-green-day[/soundcloud]

 

There are very few bands in the world who have so much talent and creativity to spread around that they could justify releasing three albums in such a short time frame – Green Day is obviously not one of them. But if you have been with the band since their darker, indie punk Kerplunk days or you’re still at that young age where Green Day’s music appeals to you, this trilogy will probably suit you just fine.

 

9 comments
Leave a reply »

 
  • Jeff
    Jeff
    December 14, 2012 at 3:18 pm

    ‘Let yourself go’ can pass as a bonus track to Bleed American? WUT?

    I do agree that DOS! > TRE! > UNO!, though.

    Reply

  • Ubertool
    @ubertool Level 3
    December 14, 2012 at 3:49 pm

    “There are very few bands in the world who have so much talent and creativity to spread around that they could justify releasing three albums in such a short time frame – Green Day is obviously not one of them” -lol

    Reply

  • Matt
    @mattdoyle Level 5
    December 15, 2012 at 1:53 pm

    That picture of BJA alone makes me cringe…

    Reply

  • airtoast
    airtoast
    December 27, 2012 at 3:37 pm

    Wow, what a horrible review of three amazing albums!

    While I will agree the lyrical content could have been tighter, the rest of this review is very misinformed. “Angel Blue” is one of the best songs from Uno. “Let Yourself Go” is Green Day to the core and bears no resemblance to anything Jimmy Eat World. “Fuck Time,” a Foxboro Hot Tubs original, sounds absolutely nothing like the description above and is easily one of their least punk-sounding songs in the trilogy. “Amanda” starts off timidly but has a very intriguing riff mid-way through and at the end, but it sounds like the reviewer shut if off before she reached them. “Brutal Love,” a 60s-esque soul song, starts off predictably but progressively grows more and more epic and sounds nothing like typical Green Day.

    For a more reputable and accurate review, please check out the honest Uno and Tre reviews by the people at Punknews.org and ignore all of the typical noise from the success backlash machine.

    Reply

    • feelgoodlost [Moderator]
      December 27, 2012 at 3:57 pm

      I feel like you don’t understand the basis or reasoning behind an album review; it is opinion based and therefore subjective. To say that one review is more accurate than another is to simply say that you agree with one more; not that one is more correct.

      Reply

  • airtoast
    airtoast
    December 27, 2012 at 4:49 pm

    Thank you for that clarification. I guess commenters are not permitted to voice their opinion of the reviews and question the accuracy of some aspects. Somehow I feel you would have liked my comment a lot more if I had agreed with the review.

    Reply

  • Anon Mouse
    @dngr Level 4
    January 11, 2013 at 8:53 pm

    Wow, couldn’t agree more.
    No need to read past, “A TRILOGY OF MEDIOCRITY”

    Reply

  • Dayton
    @dlr1124 Level 2
    April 11, 2013 at 6:09 am

    Out of the whole trilogy, I can barely craft one album worth of good songs.

    Reply

Leave a Response

Warning: If your comment includes an album download link or to an illegal download site, you will be banned!


banner
Skip to toolbar